statutory interpretation

Arizona Court of Appeals Div. One, Decisions

City of Chandler v. Roosevelt Water Conservation District

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One:  No. 1 CA-CV 23-0744  Filed October 31, 2024 City of Chandler v. Roosevelt Water Conservation District ISSUES: Whether the one-year statute of limitations in A.R.S. § 12-821 applies to actions by one public entity against another public entity, and, if so, whether the City of Chandler filed its action […]

, , , ,

City of Chandler v. Roosevelt Water Conservation District Read Post »

Arizona Supreme Court, Decisions

Pima County, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al.

Arizona Supreme Court: Pima County, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al. Case No.  CV-21-0213-PR   Filed July 22, 2024 ISSUES: Whether the 2018 amendments to A.R.S. § 15-910 eliminated the State’s obligation to reimburse the County for desegregation expenses under § 15-972(E). Whether these amendments violate article 9, section 18 of the Arizona Constitution.

, , , , , ,

Pima County, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al. Read Post »

Arizona Supreme Court, Decisions

Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Mayes

Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes   CV-23-0005-PR    Filed April 9, 2024 Key Legal Issues: Whether Title 36 statutes created a statutory right to abortion How to interpret seemingly conflicting abortion statutes Effect of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on Arizona abortion laws Resulting Opinions: Title 36 did not create an independent statutory right to

, , , , ,

Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Mayes Read Post »

Arizona Supreme Court, Decisions

In re Erica Krystal Riggins

Arizona Supreme Court:    No. CV-23-0123-CQ    Filed Date: March 7, 2024 In re Erica Krystal Riggins This case is in response to a Certified Question from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona seeking clarification of whether Proposition 209, passed by Arizona voters in November 2022, repealed or affected the validity of

, , , ,

In re Erica Krystal Riggins Read Post »

Arizona Supreme Court, Decisions

In re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. Drummond

Arizona Supreme Court:    No. CV-23-0009-CQ  Filed February 23, 2024 In re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. Drummond This case is in response to a Certified Question from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona seeking clarification of whether the term “mobile home” in A.R.S. § 33-1101(A)(3) includes motor homes. The Arizona Supreme

, , , , ,

In re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. Drummond Read Post »

Scroll to Top